KN95

Product Details

Sorry for the inconvenience, our company policy is to Write the following paragraph before any Product Description.
Thank you for your understanding

Sorting out some basic understanding before we proceed in any transaction.
Our Aim to Clean the trash of misinformation that has been killing people all over the world physically and financially. We hope you also spend a little time from your side to fact check our information.
Thank
Information Source is 3M Technical Bulletin. May, 2020. Revision 4. Comparison of FFP2, KN95, and N95

Filtering facepiece respirators (FFR), which are sometimes called disposable respirators, are subject to various regulatory standards around the world.
These standards specify certain required physical properties and performance characteristics in order for respirators to claim compliance with the particular standard.
During pandemic or emergency situations, health authorities often reference these standards when making respirator recommendations, stating, for example, that certain populations should use an “N95, FFP2, or similar” respirator.

It is reasonable

to consider China KN95, as an equivalent to US NIOSH N95 and European FFP2 respirators, for

filtering non-oil-based particles such as those resulting from wildfires, PM 2.5 air pollution,

volcanic eruptions, or bioaerosols (e.g. viruses).

N95 (United States NIOSH-42CFR84)

KN95 (China GB2626-2006)

FFP2 (Europe EN 149-2001)
P2 (Australia/New Zealand AS/NZA 1716:2012)
Korea 1st class (Korea KMOEL - 2017-64)
DS2 (Japan JMHLW-Notification 214, 2018)